↓ Skip to main content

The Importance of Large-Diameter Trees to Forest Structural Heterogeneity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Importance of Large-Diameter Trees to Forest Structural Heterogeneity
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0082784
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Philippines 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 178 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 21%
Researcher 28 15%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 65 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 44 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#10,190,882
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#85,546
of 224,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,015
of 375,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,378
of 6,059 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,628 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,059 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.