You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Importance of Large-Diameter Trees to Forest Structural Heterogeneity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0082784 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James A. Lutz, Andrew J. Larson, James A. Freund, Mark E. Swanson, Kenneth J. Bible |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 10% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 153 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 23% |
| Researcher | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,563,368
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,617
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,054
of 324,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,521
of 5,612 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,612 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.