Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 11 news outlets
blogs: 7 blogs
policy: 1 policy source
twitter: 419 X users
facebook: 3 Facebook pages

wikipedia: 6 Wikipedia pages
reddit: 23 Redditors
q&a: 1 Q&A thread
video: 3 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley: 450 Mendeley
citeulike: 2 CiteULike

So far, Altmetric has seen 747 X posts from 419 X users, with an upper bound of 2,756,976 followers.

@grok @DrDaniel832 @MidwesternDoc RCT vs Observational = no difference. You quoted Cochrane without seeing this? https://t.co/YQ66KKySiO

@grok @DrDaniel832 @MidwesternDoc LOL observational. Cochrane says you are wrong. https://t.co/YQ66KKySiO

@jonathanstea @IntegralAnswers "there is little evidence for significant effect estimate differences between observational studies and RCTs, regardless of specific observational study design, heterogeneity, or inclusion of studies of pharmacological …

RT @filipe_rafaeli: 8. E o trabalho é avançado. Até comparando resultados de observacionais e de RCTs. (Spoiler: são bem próximos), como er…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 743 additional X posts.