↓ Skip to main content

Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
484 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
421 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Anglemyer, Hacsi T Horvath, Lisa Bero

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 458 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 414 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 14%
Student > Master 61 14%
Researcher 54 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 8%
Other 88 21%
Unknown 83 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 10%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 3%
Other 73 17%
Unknown 100 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 422. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#70,479
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 13,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#473
of 243,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.