↓ Skip to main content

Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
139 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
206 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Anglemyer, Hacsi T Horvath, Lisa Bero

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 244 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 21%
Researcher 41 16%
Student > Master 37 15%
Unspecified 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 79 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 51%
Unspecified 40 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 40 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#141,778
of 13,612,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#307
of 10,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,105
of 188,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,612,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.