| Title |
Conscious Brain-to-Brain Communication in Humans Using Non-Invasive Technologies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0105225 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 279 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 60 | 5% |
| Canada | 39 | 3% |
| France | 37 | 3% |
| Spain | 37 | 3% |
| Germany | 22 | 2% |
| Mexico | 21 | 2% |
| India | 21 | 2% |
| Italy | 15 | 1% |
| Other | 186 | 16% |
| Unknown | 434 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 984 | 85% |
| Scientists | 104 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 39 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 628 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Japan | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 574 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 21% |
| Researcher | 100 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 12% |
| Other | 28 | 4% |
| Other | 121 | 19% |
| Unknown | 93 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 81 | 13% |
| Psychology | 75 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 12% |
| Engineering | 69 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 8% |
| Other | 157 | 25% |
| Unknown | 118 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2447. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2026.
All research outputs
#3,698
of 34,574,341 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#39
of 225,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13
of 280,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1
of 5,165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,574,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.