↓ Skip to main content

Halal and kosher slaughter methods and meat quality: A review

Overview of attention for article published in Meat Science, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 2,243)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
560 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Halal and kosher slaughter methods and meat quality: A review
Published in
Meat Science, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.021
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There are many slaughter procedures that religions and cultures use around the world. The two that are commercially relevant are the halal and kosher methods practiced by Muslims and Jews respectively. The global trade in red meat and poultry produced using these two methods is substantial, thus the importance of the quality of the meat produced using the methods. Halal and kosher slaughter per se should not affect meat quality more than their industrial equivalents, however, some of their associated pre- and post-slaughter processes do. For instance, the slow decline in blood pressure following a halal pre-slaughter head-only stun and neck cut causes blood splash (ecchymosis) in a range of muscles and organs of slaughtered livestock. Other quality concerns include bruising, hemorrhages, skin discoloration and broken bones particularly in poultry. In addition to these conventional quality issues, the "spiritual quality" of the meat can also be affected when the halal and kosher religious requirements are not fully met during the slaughter process. The nature, causes, importance and mitigations of these and other quality issues related to halal and kosher slaughtering and meat production using these methods are the subjects of this review.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 560 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Malaysia 4 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 547 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 16%
Student > Bachelor 69 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 12%
Researcher 41 7%
Lecturer 34 6%
Other 75 13%
Unknown 186 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 119 21%
Social Sciences 35 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 32 6%
Engineering 26 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 23 4%
Other 126 23%
Unknown 199 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2026.
All research outputs
#785,418
of 33,053,952 outputs
Outputs from Meat Science
#27
of 2,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,076
of 266,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meat Science
#2
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,053,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.