You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Role of the Upper Tidal Estuary in Wetland Blue Carbon Storage and Flux
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1029/2018gb005897 |
| Authors |
Ken W. Krauss, Gregory B. Noe, Jamie A. Duberstein, William H. Conner, Camille L. Stagg, Nicole Cormier, Miriam C. Jones, Christopher E. Bernhardt, B. Graeme Lockaby, Andrew S. From, Thomas W. Doyle, Richard H. Day, Scott H. Ensign, Katherine N. Pierfelice, Cliff R. Hupp, Alex T. Chow, Julie L. Whitbeck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 64 | 35% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 24 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,703,258
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#598
of 1,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,181
of 328,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Biogeochemical Cycles
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.