↓ Skip to main content

Multiple estimates of effective population size for monitoring a long‐lived vertebrate: an application to Yellowstone grizzly bears

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Ecology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple estimates of effective population size for monitoring a long‐lived vertebrate: an application to Yellowstone grizzly bears
Published in
Molecular Ecology, October 2015
DOI 10.1111/mec.13398
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline L Kamath, Mark A Haroldson, Gordon Luikart, David Paetkau, Craig Whitman, Frank T van Manen

Abstract

Effective population size (Ne ) is a key parameter for monitoring the genetic health of threatened populations because it reflects a population's evolutionary potential and risk of extinction due to genetic stochasticity. However, its application to wildlife monitoring has been limited because it is difficult to measure in natural populations. The isolated and well-studied population of grizzly bears (Ursus arctos) in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem provides a rare opportunity to examine the usefulness of different Ne estimators for monitoring. We genotyped 729 Yellowstone grizzly bears using 20 microsatellites and applied three single-sample estimators to examine contemporary trends in generation interval (GI), effective number of breeders (Nb ) and Ne during 1982-2007. We also used multisample methods to estimate variance (NeV ) and inbreeding Ne (NeI ). Single-sample estimates revealed positive trajectories, with over a fourfold increase in Ne (≈100 to 450) and near doubling of the GI (≈8 to 14) from the 1980s to 2000s. NeV (240-319) and NeI (256) were comparable with the harmonic mean single-sample Ne (213) over the time period. Reanalysing historical data, we found NeV increased from ≈80 in the 1910s-1960s to ≈280 in the contemporary population. The estimated ratio of effective to total census size (Ne /Nc ) was stable and high (0.42-0.66) compared to previous brown bear studies. These results support independent demographic evidence for Yellowstone grizzly bear population growth since the 1980s. They further demonstrate how genetic monitoring of Ne can complement demographic-based monitoring of Nc and vital rates, providing a valuable tool for wildlife managers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 132 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 24%
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 15%
Environmental Science 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 19 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#638,866
of 24,074,720 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Ecology
#177
of 6,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,094
of 289,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Ecology
#5
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,074,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.