↓ Skip to main content

New gene functions in megakaryopoiesis and platelet formation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
patent
13 patents
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
446 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
New gene functions in megakaryopoiesis and platelet formation
Published in
Nature, November 2011
DOI 10.1038/nature10659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Gieger, Aparna Radhakrishnan, Ana Cvejic, Weihong Tang, Eleonora Porcu, Giorgio Pistis, Jovana Serbanovic-Canic, Ulrich Elling, Alison H. Goodall, Yann Labrune, Lorna M. Lopez, Reedik Mägi, Stuart Meacham, Yukinori Okada, Nicola Pirastu, Rossella Sorice, Alexander Teumer, Katrin Voss, Weihua Zhang, Ramiro Ramirez-Solis, Joshua C. Bis, David Ellinghaus, Martin Gögele, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Claudia Langenberg, Peter Kovacs, Paul F. O’Reilly, So-Youn Shin, Tõnu Esko, Jaana Hartiala, Stavroula Kanoni, Federico Murgia, Afshin Parsa, Jonathan Stephens, Pim van der Harst, C. Ellen van der Schoot, Hooman Allayee, Antony Attwood, Beverley Balkau, François Bastardot, Saonli Basu, Sebastian E. Baumeister, Ginevra Biino, Lorenzo Bomba, Amélie Bonnefond, François Cambien, John C. Chambers, Francesco Cucca, Pio D’Adamo, Gail Davies, Rudolf A. de Boer, Eco J. C. de Geus, Angela Döring, Paul Elliott, Jeanette Erdmann, David M. Evans, Mario Falchi, Wei Feng, Aaron R. Folsom, Ian H. Frazer, Quince D. Gibson, Nicole L. Glazer, Chris Hammond, Anna-Liisa Hartikainen, Susan R. Heckbert, Christian Hengstenberg, Micha Hersch, Thomas Illig, Ruth J. F. Loos, Jennifer Jolley, Kay-Tee Khaw, Brigitte Kühnel, Marie-Christine Kyrtsonis, Vasiliki Lagou, Heather Lloyd-Jones, Thomas Lumley, Massimo Mangino, Andrea Maschio, Irene Mateo Leach, Barbara McKnight, Yasin Memari, Braxton D. Mitchell, Grant W. Montgomery, Yusuke Nakamura, Matthias Nauck, Gerjan Navis, Ute Nöthlings, Ilja M. Nolte, David J. Porteous, Anneli Pouta, Peter P. Pramstaller, Janne Pullat, Susan M. Ring, Jerome I. Rotter, Daniela Ruggiero, Aimo Ruokonen, Cinzia Sala, Nilesh J. Samani, Jennifer Sambrook, David Schlessinger, Stefan Schreiber, Heribert Schunkert, James Scott, Nicholas L. Smith, Harold Snieder, John M. Starr, Michael Stumvoll, Atsushi Takahashi, W. H. Wilson Tang, Kent Taylor, Albert Tenesa, Swee Lay Thein, Anke Tönjes, Manuela Uda, Sheila Ulivi, Dirk J. van Veldhuisen, Peter M. Visscher, Uwe Völker, H.-Erich Wichmann, Kerri L. Wiggins, Gonneke Willemsen, Tsun-Po Yang, Jing Hua Zhao, Paavo Zitting, John R. Bradley, George V. Dedoussis, Paolo Gasparini, Stanley L. Hazen, Andres Metspalu, Mario Pirastu, Alan R. Shuldiner, L. Joost van Pelt, Jaap-Jan Zwaginga, Dorret I. Boomsma, Ian J. Deary, Andre Franke, Philippe Froguel, Santhi K. Ganesh, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Nicholas G. Martin, Christa Meisinger, Bruce M. Psaty, Timothy D. Spector, Nicholas J. Wareham, Jan-Willem N. Akkerman, Marina Ciullo, Panos Deloukas, Andreas Greinacher, Steve Jupe, Naoyuki Kamatani, Jyoti Khadake, Jaspal S. Kooner, Josef Penninger, Inga Prokopenko, Derek Stemple, Daniela Toniolo, Lorenz Wernisch, Serena Sanna, Andrew A. Hicks, Augusto Rendon, Manuel A. Ferreira, Willem H. Ouwehand, Nicole Soranzo

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 428 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 129 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 17%
Professor 38 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 31 7%
Student > Master 29 7%
Other 89 20%
Unknown 54 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 157 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 78 17%
Computer Science 9 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 2%
Other 41 9%
Unknown 72 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2026.
All research outputs
#1,749,288
of 31,346,776 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#43,243
of 111,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,119
of 279,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#420
of 921 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,346,776 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 98.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 921 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.