You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Basin scale controls on CO2 and CH4 emissions from the Upper Mississippi River
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geophysical Research Letters, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/2015gl067599 |
| Authors |
John T. Crawford, Luke C. Loken, Emily H. Stanley, Edward G. Stets, Mark M. Dornblaser, Robert G. Striegl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 62% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 31% |
| Researcher | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 34 | 44% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,971,886
of 24,411,829 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#7,572
of 20,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,377
of 303,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#124
of 369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,411,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.