↓ Skip to main content

Basin scale controls on CO 2 and CH 4 emissions from the Upper Mississippi River

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basin scale controls on CO 2 and CH 4 emissions from the Upper Mississippi River
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/2015gl067599
Authors

John T. Crawford, Luke C. Loken, Emily H. Stanley, Edward G. Stets, Mark M. Dornblaser, Robert G. Striegl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 7%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 60 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 33%
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Professor 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 30 45%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 13%
Chemistry 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 8 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2016.
All research outputs
#1,629,518
of 12,342,171 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#3,296
of 12,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,789
of 344,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#281
of 1,211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.