An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, February 2016

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 1 news outlet
blogs: 5 blogs
policy: 1 policy source
twitter: 681 X users

facebook: 19 Facebook pages
googleplus: 3 Google+ users
reddit: 1 Redditor
bluesky: 2 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley: 644 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 884 X posts from 681 X users, with an upper bound of 2,416,815 followers.

RT @Laconic_doc: @DrCarolJasper @pash22 Thank you for your methodical and measured critique of these two papers... ...most of us medics ar…

@DrCarolJasper @pash22 Thank you for your methodical and measured critique of these two papers... ...most of us medics are not well trained in, or comfortable with, qualitative methods¹, and it's good to have the analysis of someone who is! [¹ https://t…

@KamranAbbasi @bmj_latest many congratulations. May I respectfully ask if you plan to revisit the implicit ban on qualitative research in the BMJ? See our 'open letter' from 2016 https://t.co/jqXGXe29z4

@Kitdempsey @DrSelvarajah @Medact @sandrogalea @DrRitaIssa @drjmartins @lucy_a_singh @DrGuddiSingh @BolaOwolabi8 Qual data definitely would be better but not sure it's given that much weight for funding/policy. https://t.co/cNt0IdeDdF

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 880 additional X posts.