↓ Skip to main content

Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
2928 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Article details
Title
Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1600651
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A widespread epidemic of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection was reported in 2015 in South and Central America and the Caribbean. A major concern associated with this infection is the apparent increased incidence of microcephaly in fetuses born to mothers infected with ZIKV. In this report, we describe the case of an expectant mother who had a febrile illness with rash at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy while she was living in Brazil. Ultrasonography performed at 29 weeks of gestation revealed microcephaly with calcifications in the fetal brain and placenta. After the mother requested termination of the pregnancy, a fetal autopsy was performed. Micrencephaly (an abnormally small brain) was observed, with almost complete agyria, hydrocephalus, and multifocal dystrophic calcifications in the cortex and subcortical white matter, with associated cortical displacement and mild focal inflammation. ZIKV was found in the fetal brain tissue on reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay, with consistent findings on electron microscopy. The complete genome of ZIKV was recovered from the fetal brain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history

Loading chart data

Monthly Attention Score data from August 2022 to July 2025. Daily data from 25 July 2025.

An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.

No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.

Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,308 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,928 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 31 1%
United States 19 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 2843 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 556 19%
Student > Master 448 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 368 13%
Researcher 336 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 176 6%
Other 513 18%
Unknown 531 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 656 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 449 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 386 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 211 7%
Neuroscience 93 3%
Other 508 17%
Unknown 625 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2026.
All research outputs
#4,852
of 34,634,910 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#282
of 38,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36
of 458,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#2
of 361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,634,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 120.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.