↓ Skip to main content

Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1717 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2485 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, March 2016
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1600651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jernej Mlakar, Misa Korva, Nataša Tul, Mara Popović, Mateja Poljšak-Prijatelj, Jerica Mraz, Marko Kolenc, Katarina Resman Rus, Tina Vesnaver Vipotnik, Vesna Fabjan Vodušek, Alenka Vizjak, Jože Pižem, Miroslav Petrovec, Tatjana Avšič Županc

Abstract

A widespread epidemic of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection was reported in 2015 in South and Central America and the Caribbean. A major concern associated with this infection is the apparent increased incidence of microcephaly in fetuses born to mothers infected with ZIKV. In this report, we describe the case of an expectant mother who had a febrile illness with rash at the end of the first trimester of pregnancy while she was living in Brazil. Ultrasonography performed at 29 weeks of gestation revealed microcephaly with calcifications in the fetal brain and placenta. After the mother requested termination of the pregnancy, a fetal autopsy was performed. Micrencephaly (an abnormally small brain) was observed, with almost complete agyria, hydrocephalus, and multifocal dystrophic calcifications in the cortex and subcortical white matter, with associated cortical displacement and mild focal inflammation. ZIKV was found in the fetal brain tissue on reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assay, with consistent findings on electron microscopy. The complete genome of ZIKV was recovered from the fetal brain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,564 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 38 2%
United States 20 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Other 11 <1%
Unknown 2390 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 542 22%
Student > Master 412 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 332 13%
Researcher 312 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 158 6%
Other 472 19%
Unknown 257 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 636 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 438 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 329 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 190 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 80 3%
Other 472 19%
Unknown 340 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,585
of 17,076,095 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#104
of 28,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17
of 349,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#1
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,076,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,085 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 89.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.