↓ Skip to main content

Predicting geogenic Arsenic in Drinking Water Wells in Glacial Aquifers, North‐Central USA: Accounting for Depth‐Dependent Features

Overview of attention for article published in Water Resources Research, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting geogenic Arsenic in Drinking Water Wells in Glacial Aquifers, North‐Central USA: Accounting for Depth‐Dependent Features
Published in
Water Resources Research, December 2018
DOI 10.1029/2018wr023106
Authors

M. L. Erickson, S. M. Elliott, C. A. Christenson, A. L. Krall

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 26%
Engineering 8 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 21 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#20,808,165
of 26,435,181 outputs
Outputs from Water Resources Research
#4,664
of 5,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,246
of 449,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Resources Research
#63
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,435,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.