↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1): Pathways of Exposure at the Animal‐Human Interface, a Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014582
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The threat posed by highly pathogenic avian influenza A H5N1 viruses to humans remains significant, given the continued occurrence of sporadic human cases (499 human cases in 15 countries) with a high case fatality rate (approximately 60%), the endemicity in poultry populations in several countries, and the potential for reassortment with the newly emerging 2009 H1N1 pandemic strain. Therefore, we review risk factors for H5N1 infection in humans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Uzbekistan 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 238 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 21%
Student > Bachelor 37 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Student > Master 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 4%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 23 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 61 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2025.
All research outputs
#2,055,833
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,617
of 224,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,153
of 256,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#159
of 1,655 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,655 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.