↓ Skip to main content

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1): Pathways of Exposure at the Animal‐Human Interface, a Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1): Pathways of Exposure at the Animal‐Human Interface, a Systematic Review
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014582
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria D. Van Kerkhove, Elizabeth Mumford, Anthony W. Mounts, Joseph Bresee, Sowath Ly, Carolyn B. Bridges, Joachim Otte

Abstract

The threat posed by highly pathogenic avian influenza A H5N1 viruses to humans remains significant, given the continued occurrence of sporadic human cases (499 human cases in 15 countries) with a high case fatality rate (approximately 60%), the endemicity in poultry populations in several countries, and the potential for reassortment with the newly emerging 2009 H1N1 pandemic strain. Therefore, we review risk factors for H5N1 infection in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
France 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Uzbekistan 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 218 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 23%
Student > Bachelor 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Student > Master 20 9%
Other 10 4%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 17%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 22 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 48 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,062,535
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#37,109
of 225,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,996
of 196,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#276
of 1,312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.