↓ Skip to main content

Fruit and Soil Quality of Organic and Conventional Strawberry Agroecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
24 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
29 Redditors
pinterest
1 Pinner
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
443 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fruit and Soil Quality of Organic and Conventional Strawberry Agroecosystems
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012346
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Sale of organic foods is one of the fastest growing market segments within the global food industry. People often buy organic food because they believe organic farms produce more nutritious and better tasting food from healthier soils. Here we tested if there are significant differences in fruit and soil quality from 13 pairs of commercial organic and conventional strawberry agroecosystems in California.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 443 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Canada 5 1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 416 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 71 16%
Student > Bachelor 68 15%
Student > Master 65 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 5%
Other 84 19%
Unknown 78 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 199 45%
Environmental Science 47 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 5%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 3%
Other 61 14%
Unknown 89 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2025.
All research outputs
#324,662
of 34,361,833 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,361
of 224,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#804
of 149,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#24
of 1,122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,361,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.