↓ Skip to main content

Fruit and Soil Quality of Organic and Conventional Strawberry Agroecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
pinterest
1 Pinner
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
414 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fruit and Soil Quality of Organic and Conventional Strawberry Agroecosystems
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012346
Pubmed ID
Authors

John P. Reganold, Preston K. Andrews, Jennifer R. Reeve, Lynne Carpenter-Boggs, Christopher W. Schadt, J. Richard Alldredge, Carolyn F. Ross, Neal M. Davies, Jizhong Zhou

Abstract

Sale of organic foods is one of the fastest growing market segments within the global food industry. People often buy organic food because they believe organic farms produce more nutritious and better tasting food from healthier soils. Here we tested if there are significant differences in fruit and soil quality from 13 pairs of commercial organic and conventional strawberry agroecosystems in California.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Canada 5 1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 387 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 68 16%
Researcher 67 16%
Student > Master 64 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 23 6%
Other 80 19%
Unknown 59 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 192 46%
Environmental Science 47 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 5%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 3%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 70 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#262,976
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,789
of 222,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#657
of 104,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#22
of 884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.