↓ Skip to main content

Maize genomes to fields (G2F): 2014–2017 field seasons: genotype, phenotype, climatic, soil, and inbred ear image datasets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Maize genomes to fields (G2F): 2014–2017 field seasons: genotype, phenotype, climatic, soil, and inbred ear image datasets
Published in
BMC Research Notes, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13104-020-4922-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bridget A. McFarland, Naser AlKhalifah, Martin Bohn, Jessica Bubert, Edward S. Buckler, Ignacio Ciampitti, Jode Edwards, David Ertl, Joseph L. Gage, Celeste M. Falcon, Sherry Flint-Garcia, Michael A. Gore, Christopher Graham, Candice N. Hirsch, James B. Holland, Elizabeth Hood, David Hooker, Diego Jarquin, Shawn M. Kaeppler, Joseph Knoll, Greg Kruger, Nick Lauter, Elizabeth C. Lee, Dayane C. Lima, Aaron Lorenz, Jonathan P. Lynch, John McKay, Nathan D. Miller, Stephen P. Moose, Seth C. Murray, Rebecca Nelson, Christina Poudyal, Torbert Rocheford, Oscar Rodriguez, Maria Cinta Romay, James C. Schnable, Patrick S. Schnable, Brian Scully, Rajandeep Sekhon, Kevin Silverstein, Maninder Singh, Margaret Smith, Edgar P. Spalding, Nathan Springer, Kurt Thelen, Peter Thomison, Mitchell Tuinstra, Jason Wallace, Ramona Walls, David Wills, Randall J. Wisser, Wenwei Xu, Cheng-Ting Yeh, Natalia de Leon

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Professor 5 7%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 33 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,923,170
of 28,667,723 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#200
of 4,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,720
of 492,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#4
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,667,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 492,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.