↓ Skip to main content

Cross-validation to select Bayesian hierarchical models in phylogenetics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cross-validation to select Bayesian hierarchical models in phylogenetics
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12862-016-0688-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 67 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#24,089,907
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,814
of 3,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,656
of 341,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#53
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.