You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cross-validation to select Bayesian hierarchical models in phylogenetics
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12862-016-0688-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sebastián Duchêne, David A. Duchêne, Francesca Di Giallonardo, John-Sebastian Eden, Jemma L. Geoghegan, Kathryn E. Holt, Simon Y. W. Ho, Edward C. Holmes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 7 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 31% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 55% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,915
of 3,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,491
of 356,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#41
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.