↓ Skip to main content

Comparing DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene Amplification Methods for Plant-Associated Bacterial Communities

Overview of attention for article published in Phytobiomes Journal, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 301)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
20 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparing DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene Amplification Methods for Plant-Associated Bacterial Communities
Published in
Phytobiomes Journal, January 2021
DOI 10.1094/pbiomes-07-20-0055-r
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 143 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 19%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 3%
Student > Bachelor 5 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 61 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 70 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2025.
All research outputs
#1,190,227
of 32,440,831 outputs
Outputs from Phytobiomes Journal
#37
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,482
of 559,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytobiomes Journal
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,440,831 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 559,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.