You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is ‘viability’ viable? Abortion, conceptual confusion and the law in England and Wales and the United States
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Law and the Biosciences, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1093/jlb/lsaa059 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth Chloe Romanis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 25% |
United States | 8 | 18% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Andorra | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 33 | 75% |
Scientists | 10 | 23% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 16% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 639. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#35,148
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Law and the Biosciences
#4
of 397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,320
of 438,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Law and the Biosciences
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.