You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparing Scat Detection Dogs, Cameras, and Hair Snares for Surveying Carnivores
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.2193/2006-292 |
Authors |
ROBERT A. LONG, THERESE M. DONOVAN, PAULA MACKAY, WILLIAM J. ZIELINSKI, JEFFREY S. BUZAS |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 569 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 2% |
Brazil | 11 | 2% |
India | 3 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
Other | 12 | 2% |
Unknown | 524 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 148 | 26% |
Student > Master | 114 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 91 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 36 | 6% |
Other | 36 | 6% |
Other | 78 | 14% |
Unknown | 66 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 322 | 57% |
Environmental Science | 126 | 22% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 1% |
Computer Science | 4 | <1% |
Other | 21 | 4% |
Unknown | 79 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#1,804,001
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#208
of 2,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,708
of 189,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#4
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.