Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences

- the only way of knowing if it's worked ecologically is by doing rigorous impact evaluations; no other kinds of study design (e.g. before-after) gives you the info you need (e.g. see @AlecChristie888's https://t.co/PajTP5Fyng)

RT @NatureComms: Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates tha…

Christie et al. Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences. Nat Commun 11, 6377 (2020). https://t.co/19pdyMJUWU

Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences. Christie A et al. #EHUpaper in Nature Communications https://t.co/0SaqKNd2xj https://t.co/SALeGJh3a6

"The importance of study design has often been overlooked in debates over the inability of researchers to reproduce the original results of published studies...in favour of other issues (e.g., p-hacking...and...‘HARKing’." https://t.co/gQo3FepZix

In sintesi: er "famolo strano" è passato de moda! https://t.co/WOjEEoJX29 @sciencedirect #scienzesociali #bias PS off topic: ve siete sfonnati de cibo? #Natale2020

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @tatsuya_amano: 本研究では、Before-After-Control-Impactデザインで取得されたデータから得られる結果を、他のデザインが用いられたと仮定した場合の結果と比較することで、Control-Impact, Before-Afterなど簡易的…

本研究では、Before-After-Control-Impactデザインで取得されたデータから得られる結果を、他のデザインが用いられたと仮定した場合の結果と比較することで、Control-Impact, Before-Afterなど簡易的な研究デザインから得られた結果にはバイアスが生じることを示しました。 h…

RT @ecoevol_MNCN: #MNCNPub Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences htt…

#MNCNPub Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.co/zLc2aYM95G @NatureComms

RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…

RT @NatureComms: Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates tha…

RT @FilipeEco: A credibilidade dos estudos científicos e seus resultados é essencial p/ a tomada de decisões baseada em evidências. Nosso…

RT @FilipeEco: A credibilidade dos estudos científicos e seus resultados é essencial p/ a tomada de decisões baseada em evidências. Nosso…

RT @NatureComms: Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates tha…

RT @NatureComms: Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates tha…

Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates than simpler observational designs. https://t.co/q1Yg3ljHV2 @alecchristie888 @conservationevidence @Bill_Sutherland @tatsuya_amano @…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…

RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…

RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…

RT @FilipeEco: A credibilidade dos estudos científicos e seus resultados é essencial p/ a tomada de decisões baseada em evidências. Nosso…

RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…

A credibilidade dos estudos científicos e seus resultados é essencial p/ a tomada de decisões baseada em evidências. Nosso estudo liderado por @AlecChristie888 na @NatureComms quantifica o viés de desenhos amostrais usados nas ciências sociais e naturai…

"Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findings." Check out our new @NatureComms study quantifying the use and bias of study designs - a massive effort led by @AlecChristie88…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @Traffic_Science: Study design is essential to ensuring conservation effectiveness, yet its all too often overlooked in field research a…

Study design is essential to ensuring conservation effectiveness, yet its all too often overlooked in field research and evidence synthesis. Such a great paper, well done @AlecChristie888 & @ConservEvidence and team.

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @LauraEllenDee: This looks great and highly relevant for our work!! @pauljferraro @jebyrnes @e_seabloom @e_borer @kaitkimm @adam_t_clark…

RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…

RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…

RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…

RT @DrNoreika: Our very significant collaborative paper is out in @NatureComms. Pairwise within-study comparisons across 49 datasets showed…

This looks great and highly relevant for our work!! @pauljferraro @jebyrnes @e_seabloom @e_borer @kaitkimm @adam_t_clark @AkiraSMori @ChrisSeveren

RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…

RT @JanneKotiaho: The credibility of studies is fundamentally determined by study design. Yet, quantifiably less biased study designs are p…

RT @Pablo_ecology: Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.c…

Congratulations on a great paper! @uniofjyvaskyla @JYU_WISDOM @jyuscience

RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @tyzissou: New paper out in @NatureComms led by PhD student Alec Christie from @ConservEvidence @Cambridge_Uni on the influence of study…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

New paper out in @NatureComms led by PhD student Alec Christie from @ConservEvidence @Cambridge_Uni on the influence of study design on bias We propose a model-based approach to combine study estimates that suffer from study design bias @marineinstitut…

The credibility of studies is fundamentally determined by study design. Yet, quantifiably less biased study designs are poorly represented in the environmental and social sciences. https://t.co/NbzHQjn1Wf

RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…

RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…

Our very significant collaborative paper is out in @NatureComms. Pairwise within-study comparisons across 49 datasets showed that randomized& controlled pre-intervention sampling designs usually give less biased estimates than simpler observational …

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @Pablo_ecology: Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.c…

RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…

Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.co/HsG2zAwWhX

This looks like a really important paper. Looking forward to read more carefully.

Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The weaker designs dominate the conservation and social science literatures. https://t.co/bjYxeqcKwA

RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

RT @aurora_torresm: Check our new paper wonderfully led by @AlecChristie on the importance of accounting for the bias of study designs in e…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

@AlecChristie888, it was a pleasure and a honor to be part of such an important and nicely led endeavor!

🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences. Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findings!…

RT @aurora_torresm: Check our new paper wonderfully led by @AlecChristie on the importance of accounting for the bias of study designs in e…

RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…

Check this out # teamcounterfactual @idoimpact

"Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t.co/xgLM0HNTME Out today in @NatureComms. Outsanding work lead by @AlecChristie888 and building on the @ConservEvidence database. @P…

Check our new paper wonderfully led by @AlecChristie on the importance of accounting for the bias of study designs in evidence synthesis

Great work Alec!