RT @sophusticated: - the only way of knowing if it's worked ecologically is by doing rigorous impact evaluations; no other kinds of study d…
- the only way of knowing if it's worked ecologically is by doing rigorous impact evaluations; no other kinds of study design (e.g. before-after) gives you the info you need (e.g. see @AlecChristie888's https://t.co/PajTP5Fyng)
@_PhilMartin Yep thanks! Seen a few good papers coming out like this recently including Hannah's, shame none cite this 😂😪 ... https://t.co/ouaKu7l0XP
Chapters 3 & 4 were published in the Journal of Applied Ecology: https://t.co/LiJHOJM5D0 and Nature Communications, respectively: https://t.co/EZ5RDZTdP7 /7
RT @NatureComms: Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates tha…
Christie et al. Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences. Nat Commun 11, 6377 (2020). https://t.co/19pdyMJUWU
Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences. Christie A et al. #EHUpaper in Nature Communications https://t.co/0SaqKNd2xj https://t.co/SALeGJh3a6
"The importance of study design has often been overlooked in debates over the inability of researchers to reproduce the original results of published studies...in favour of other issues (e.g., p-hacking...and...‘HARKing’." https://t.co/gQo3FepZix
In sintesi: er "famolo strano" è passato de moda! https://t.co/WOjEEoJX29 @sciencedirect #scienzesociali #bias PS off topic: ve siete sfonnati de cibo? #Natale2020
RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @tatsuya_amano: 本研究では、Before-After-Control-Impactデザインで取得されたデータから得られる結果を、他のデザインが用いられたと仮定した場合の結果と比較することで、Control-Impact, Before-Afterなど簡易的…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
本研究では、Before-After-Control-Impactデザインで取得されたデータから得られる結果を、他のデザインが用いられたと仮定した場合の結果と比較することで、Control-Impact, Before-Afterなど簡易的な研究デザインから得られた結果にはバイアスが生じることを示しました。 https://t.co/rtguZXA3jm
And if you are interested in broader types of study designs check out my paper in Nature Communications... https://t.co/VRH9LghuOm It's great they've come out at a similar time as they both tackle subtly different but intrinsically related and important is
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @ecoevol_MNCN: #MNCNPub Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences htt…
#MNCNPub Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.co/zLc2aYM95G @NatureComms
RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…
Secondly, @AlecChristie888 et al. quantify and address the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences in this brand new paper in @NatureComms: https://t.co/9QBPNePuub
RT @NatureComms: Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates tha…
RT @FilipeEco: A credibilidade dos estudos científicos e seus resultados é essencial p/ a tomada de decisões baseada em evidências. Nosso…
RT @FilipeEco: A credibilidade dos estudos científicos e seus resultados é essencial p/ a tomada de decisões baseada em evidências. Nosso…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @NatureComms: Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates tha…
RT @NatureComms: Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates tha…
RT @NatureComms: Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates tha…
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
Study that looks across 49 environmental datasets finds that these types of designs usually give less biased estimates than simpler observational designs. https://t.co/q1Yg3ljHV2 @alecchristie888 @conservationevidence @Bill_Sutherland @tatsuya_amano @_Ph
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…
RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…
RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…
RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…
RT @FilipeEco: A credibilidade dos estudos científicos e seus resultados é essencial p/ a tomada de decisões baseada em evidências. Nosso…
RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…
RT @FilipeEco: A credibilidade dos estudos científicos e seus resultados é essencial p/ a tomada de decisões baseada em evidências. Nosso…
RT @FilipeEco: "Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findin…
A credibilidade dos estudos científicos e seus resultados é essencial p/ a tomada de decisões baseada em evidências. Nosso estudo liderado por @AlecChristie888 na @NatureComms quantifica o viés de desenhos amostrais usados nas ciências sociais e naturais
"Building trust in science and evidence-based decision-making depends heavily on the credibility of studies and their findings." Check out our new @NatureComms study quantifying the use and bias of study designs - a massive effort led by @AlecChristie888
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
New paper out ! Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences @NatureComms A great effort lead by @AlecChristie888 https://t.co/jvJCQSAqSv
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @Traffic_Science: Study design is essential to ensuring conservation effectiveness, yet its all too often overlooked in field research a…
Study design is essential to ensuring conservation effectiveness, yet its all too often overlooked in field research and evidence synthesis. Such a great paper, well done @AlecChristie888 & @ConservEvidence and team.
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @LauraEllenDee: This looks great and highly relevant for our work!! @pauljferraro @jebyrnes @e_seabloom @e_borer @kaitkimm @adam_t_clark…
RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…
RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…
RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…
RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…
RT @DrNoreika: Our very significant collaborative paper is out in @NatureComms. Pairwise within-study comparisons across 49 datasets showed…
This looks great and highly relevant for our work!! @pauljferraro @jebyrnes @e_seabloom @e_borer @kaitkimm @adam_t_clark @AkiraSMori @ChrisSeveren
RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…
RT @JanneKotiaho: The credibility of studies is fundamentally determined by study design. Yet, quantifiably less biased study designs are p…
RT @Pablo_ecology: Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.c…
RT @Pablo_ecology: Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.c…
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
Congratulations on a great paper! @uniofjyvaskyla @JYU_WISDOM @jyuscience
RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @Pablo_ecology: Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.c…
RT @AlecChristie888: Pinning my recent PhD papers: 1. Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environme…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @AlecChristie888: Pinning my recent PhD papers: 1. Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environme…
Pinning my recent PhD papers: 1. Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences. Nat. Commun. https://t.co/DSEWU6gINU 2. The challenge of biased evidence in conservation. Conserv. Biol. https:
RT @tyzissou: New paper out in @NatureComms led by PhD student Alec Christie from @ConservEvidence @Cambridge_Uni on the influence of study…
RT @tyzissou: New paper out in @NatureComms led by PhD student Alec Christie from @ConservEvidence @Cambridge_Uni on the influence of study…
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
New paper out in @NatureComms led by PhD student Alec Christie from @ConservEvidence @Cambridge_Uni on the influence of study design on bias We propose a model-based approach to combine study estimates that suffer from study design bias @marineinstitute
The credibility of studies is fundamentally determined by study design. Yet, quantifiably less biased study designs are poorly represented in the environmental and social sciences. https://t.co/NbzHQjn1Wf
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @Bill_Sutherland: Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The we…
Our very significant collaborative paper is out in @NatureComms. Pairwise within-study comparisons across 49 datasets showed that randomized& controlled pre-intervention sampling designs usually give less biased estimates than simpler observational des
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @Pablo_ecology: Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.c…
Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences https://t.co/HsG2zAwWhX
This looks like a really important paper. Looking forward to read more carefully.
Paper led by @AlecChristie888 quantifying the bias of a range of experimental designs in testing interventions. The weaker designs dominate the conservation and social science literatures. https://t.co/bjYxeqcKwA
"Randomised designs & controlled observational designs with pre-intervention sampling were used by 23% of intervention studies in biodiv conservation & 36% in social science. We demonstrate these types of designs give less biased estimates than sim
RT @RicardoNature: "Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sciences" https://t…
RT @AlecChristie888: Very pleased my final PhD chapter is now out in @NatureComms, 3 yrs of hard work finally paid off. We quantify the use…
RT @JoachimClaudet: 🚨Paper Alert 🚨 Quantifying and addressing the prevalence and bias of study designs in the environmental and social sci…