↓ Skip to main content

Ketogenic diet for epilepsy treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 1,635)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors
video
5 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
468 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ketogenic diet for epilepsy treatment
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2016
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20160116
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The ketogenic diet (KD), a high-fat, low-carbohydrate, and adequate-protein diet is an established, effective nonpharmacologic treatment option for intractable childhood epilepsy. The KD was developed in 1921 and even though it has been increasingly used worldwide in the past decade, many neurologists are not familiar with this therapeutic approach. In the past few years, alternative and more flexible KD variants have been developed to make the treatment easier and more palatable while reducing side effects and making it available to larger group of refractory epilepsy patients. This review summarizes the history of the KD and the principles and efficacy of the classic ketogenic diet, medium-chain triglyceride(s) (MCT) ketogenic diet, modified Atkins diet, and low glycemic index treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 468 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 93 20%
Student > Master 40 9%
Researcher 20 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 4%
Other 16 3%
Other 47 10%
Unknown 234 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 7%
Neuroscience 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Other 32 7%
Unknown 247 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,421,706
of 32,838,942 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#23
of 1,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,301
of 328,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,838,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,635 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.