↓ Skip to main content

Ketogenic diet for epilepsy treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 1,369)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
5 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
418 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ketogenic diet for epilepsy treatment
Published in
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, October 2016
DOI 10.1590/0004-282x20160116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Letícia Pereira de Brito Sampaio

Abstract

The ketogenic diet (KD), a high-fat, low-carbohydrate, and adequate-protein diet is an established, effective nonpharmacologic treatment option for intractable childhood epilepsy. The KD was developed in 1921 and even though it has been increasingly used worldwide in the past decade, many neurologists are not familiar with this therapeutic approach. In the past few years, alternative and more flexible KD variants have been developed to make the treatment easier and more palatable while reducing side effects and making it available to larger group of refractory epilepsy patients. This review summarizes the history of the KD and the principles and efficacy of the classic ketogenic diet, medium-chain triglyceride(s) (MCT) ketogenic diet, modified Atkins diet, and low glycemic index treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 418 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 89 21%
Student > Master 38 9%
Researcher 20 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 4%
Other 16 4%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 180 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 62 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 61 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 7%
Neuroscience 18 4%
Unspecified 14 3%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 193 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,153,812
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#16
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,166
of 332,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.