↓ Skip to main content

Biofilm production by multiresistant Corynebacterium striatumassociated with nosocomial outbreak

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biofilm production by multiresistant Corynebacterium striatumassociated with nosocomial outbreak
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, April 2015
DOI 10.1590/0074-02760140373
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cassius de Souza, Yuri Vieira Faria, Lincoln de Oliveira Sant’Anna, Vanilda Gonçalves Viana, Sérgio Henrique Seabra, Mônica Cristina de Souza, Verônica Viana Vieira, Raphael Hirata, Lílian de Oliveira Moreira, Ana Luíza de Mattos-Guaraldi

Abstract

Corynebacterium striatum is a potentially pathogenic microorganism that causes nosocomial outbreaks. However, little is known about its virulence factors that may contribute to healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). We investigated the biofilm production on abiotic surfaces of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and multidrug-susceptible (MDS) strains of C. striatum of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis types I-MDR, II-MDR, III-MDS and IV-MDS isolated during a nosocomial outbreak in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The results showed that C. striatum was able to adhere to hydrophilic and hydrophobic abiotic surfaces. The C. striatum 1987/I-MDR strain, predominantly isolated from patients undergoing endotracheal intubation procedures, showed the greatest ability to adhere to all surfaces. C. striatum bound fibrinogen to its surface, which contributed to biofilm formation. Scanning electron microscopy showed the production of mature biofilms on polyurethane catheters by all pulsotypes. In conclusion, biofilm production may contribute to the establishment of HAIs caused by C. striatum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 88 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 26 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#1,299
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,606
of 279,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.