↓ Skip to main content

Documento faz diferença: o caso das trabalhadoras domésticas brasileiras em Massachusetts, Estados Unidos

Overview of attention for article published in Cadernos de Saúde Pública, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Documento faz diferença: o caso das trabalhadoras domésticas brasileiras em Massachusetts, Estados Unidos
Published in
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, July 2016
DOI 10.1590/0102-311x00131115
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Eduardo Siqueira, Gabriella Barreto Soares, Pedro Luiz de Araújo, Maria Natalicia Tracy

Abstract

Brazilian immigrants in the United States experience various social, labor, and health challenges. This study aimed to analyze the profile of female Brazilian domestic workers in Massachusetts, USA, through a description of their working conditions and self-rated health. This was a cross-sectional study of 198 domestic workers in Massachusetts, recruited with "snowball" sampling. The instrument addressed participants' demographic characteristics, work conditions, and self-rated health. Data were analyzed with SPSS 21.0. Among the interviewees, 95.5% were women, 62.1% were 30 to 49 years of age, and 55.6% were undocumented. Documented and undocumented participants showed statistically significant differences in demographics, work conditions, and health. Irregular immigrant status appears to have a negative impact on domestic workers' living and health conditions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Lecturer 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 19%
Psychology 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#24,997,390
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#1,628
of 1,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#277,852
of 317,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.