↓ Skip to main content

Saúde do trabalhador: aspectos históricos, avanços e desafios no Sistema Único de Saúde

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Saúde do trabalhador: aspectos históricos, avanços e desafios no Sistema Único de Saúde
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018236.04922018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This article draws on current understandings of workers' health in Brazil that emerged concomitantly with advances in the field of public health. It describes the institutional trajectory of the field of workers' health within the Unified Health System (SUS), emphasizing the challenges faced in developing actions in the sphere of workers' health surveillance. It synthesizes the often tortuous path taken over the last 30 years between multiprofessional training processes, coordination between different levels of the SUS, interinstitutional support, especially from public universities, and interaction with participatory processes. It provides an overview of progress and challenges in the face of continuous changes in working conditions and work organization and the limited effectiveness of government policies designed to address occupational health risks. Finally, it suggest that progress has come out of the intertwining of social and academic movements, with the opening up of institutional spaces that transform the SUS, reviving the underlying principles of participation and health promotion in broad vision of state policy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 32 16%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Professor 9 5%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 82 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 28 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 9%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Psychology 9 5%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 90 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,009,105
of 28,815,917 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#102
of 2,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,745
of 348,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#15
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,815,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.