↓ Skip to main content

Saúde do trabalhador: aspectos históricos, avanços e desafios no Sistema Único de Saúde

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Saúde do trabalhador: aspectos históricos, avanços e desafios no Sistema Único de Saúde
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, June 2018
DOI 10.1590/1413-81232018236.04922018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Minayo Gomez, Luiz Carlos Fadel de Vasconcellos, Jorge Mesquita Huet Machado

Abstract

This article draws on current understandings of workers' health in Brazil that emerged concomitantly with advances in the field of public health. It describes the institutional trajectory of the field of workers' health within the Unified Health System (SUS), emphasizing the challenges faced in developing actions in the sphere of workers' health surveillance. It synthesizes the often tortuous path taken over the last 30 years between multiprofessional training processes, coordination between different levels of the SUS, interinstitutional support, especially from public universities, and interaction with participatory processes. It provides an overview of progress and challenges in the face of continuous changes in working conditions and work organization and the limited effectiveness of government policies designed to address occupational health risks. Finally, it suggest that progress has come out of the intertwining of social and academic movements, with the opening up of institutional spaces that transform the SUS, reviving the underlying principles of participation and health promotion in broad vision of state policy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 176 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 19%
Student > Bachelor 33 19%
Student > Postgraduate 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Professor 8 5%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 64 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 11%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Psychology 8 5%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 72 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,634,108
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#86
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,998
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
#11
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.