↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines proposal for clinical recognition of mouth breathing children

Overview of attention for article published in Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 434)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Guidelines proposal for clinical recognition of mouth breathing children
Published in
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, August 2015
DOI 10.1590/2176-9451.20.4.039-044.oar
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mouth breathing (MB) is an etiological factor for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) during childhood. The habit of breathing through the mouth may be perpetuated even after airway clearance. Both habit and obstruction may cause facial muscle imbalance and craniofacial changes. The aim of this paper is to propose and test guidelines for clinical recognition of MB and some predisposing factors for SDB in children. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 110 orthodontists regarding their procedures for clinical evaluation of MB and their knowledge about SDB during childhood. Thereafter, based on their answers, guidelines were developed and tested in 687 children aged between 6 and 12 years old and attending elementary schools. There was no standardization for clinical recognition of MB among orthodontists. The most common procedures performed were inefficient to recognize differences between MB by habit or obstruction. The guidelines proposed herein facilitate clinical recognition of MB, help clinicians to differentiate between habit and obstruction, suggest the most appropriate treatment for each case, and avoid maintenance of mouth breathing patterns during adulthood.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 286 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 14%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 3%
Other 30 10%
Unknown 146 51%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 148 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2026.
All research outputs
#5,581,189
of 32,273,179 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#32
of 434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,441
of 291,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,273,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them