↓ Skip to main content

Anti-tumor properties of blackseed (Nigella sativa L.) extracts

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anti-tumor properties of blackseed (Nigella sativa L.) extracts
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, April 2007
DOI 10.1590/s0100-879x2006005000108
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer effect of Nigella sativa L. seed extracts. The essential oil (IC50 = 0.6%, v/v) and ethyl acetate (IC50 = 0.75%) extracts were more cytotoxic against the P815 cell line than the butanol extract (IC50 = 2%). Similar results were obtained with the Vero cell line. Although all extracts had a comparable cytotoxic effect against the ICO1 cell line, with IC50 values ranging from 0.2 to 0.26% (v/v), tests on the BSR cell line revealed a high cytotoxic effect of the ethyl acetate extract (IC50 = 0.2%) compared to the essential oil (IC50 = 1.2%). These data show that the cytotoxicity of each extract depends on the tumor cell type. In vivo, using the DBA2/P815 (H2d) mouse model, our results clearly showed that the injection of the essential oil into the tumor site significantly inhibited solid tumor development. Indeed, on the 30th day of treatment, the tumor volume of the control animals was 2.5 +/- 0.6 cm(3), whereas the tumor volumes of the essential oil-treated animals were 0.22 +/- 0.1 and 0.16 +/- 0.1 cm(3) when the animals were injected with 30 microL (28.5 mg)/mouse and 50 microL (47.5 mg)/mouse per 48 h (six times), respectively. Interestingly, the administration of the essential oil into the tumor site inhibited the incidence of liver metastasis development and improved mouse survival.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 240 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Master 33 13%
Researcher 18 7%
Lecturer 16 6%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 70 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 9%
Chemistry 18 7%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 80 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2020.
All research outputs
#26,574,977
of 33,241,971 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#1,199
of 1,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,354
of 122,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,241,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,191 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.