↓ Skip to main content

The rise and fall of the Refugial Hypothesis of Amazonian speciation: a paleoecological perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Biota Neotropica, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
651 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The rise and fall of the Refugial Hypothesis of Amazonian speciation: a paleoecological perspective
Published in
Biota Neotropica, January 2006
DOI 10.1590/s1676-06032006000100002
Authors

Mark B. Bush, Paulo E. de Oliveira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 651 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 57 9%
Colombia 6 <1%
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 562 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 124 19%
Researcher 109 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 14%
Student > Bachelor 70 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 58 9%
Other 149 23%
Unknown 49 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 426 65%
Environmental Science 80 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 39 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 3%
Social Sciences 7 1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 65 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,575,753
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,249
of 175,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them