↓ Skip to main content

The rise and fall of the Refugial Hypothesis of Amazonian speciation: a paleoecological perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Biota Neotropica, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 197)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
620 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The rise and fall of the Refugial Hypothesis of Amazonian speciation: a paleoecological perspective
Published in
Biota Neotropica, January 2006
DOI 10.1590/s1676-06032006000100002
Authors

Mark B. Bush, Paulo E. de Oliveira

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 620 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 57 9%
Colombia 6 <1%
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 531 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 123 20%
Researcher 107 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 15%
Student > Bachelor 69 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 59 10%
Other 142 23%
Unknown 30 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 422 68%
Environmental Science 79 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 35 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 3%
Social Sciences 7 1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 44 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#5,888,708
of 21,124,412 outputs
Outputs from Biota Neotropica
#16
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,303
of 304,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biota Neotropica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,124,412 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them