↓ Skip to main content

Phacoemulsification versus extracapsular extraction: governmental costs

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Phacoemulsification versus extracapsular extraction: governmental costs
Published in
Clinics, April 2010
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322010000400002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To evaluate the governmental costs of patients undergoing phacoemulsification and extracapsular cataract extraction at a public hospital in a developing country.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 4 7%
Nigeria 1 2%
Unknown 51 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 12 21%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 13 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#667
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,549
of 103,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.