↓ Skip to main content

Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
386 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
423 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, May 2012
DOI 10.2471/blt.11.099424
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances S Mair, Carl May, Catherine O’Donnell, Tracy Finch, Frank Sullivan, Elizabeth Murray

Abstract

To systematically review the literature on the implementation of e-health to identify: (i) barriers and facilitators to e-health implementation, and (ii) outstanding gaps in research on the subject.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 423 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 419 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 6%
Student > Bachelor 18 4%
Researcher 16 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 253 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 7%
Computer Science 20 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 4%
Psychology 13 3%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 263 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,326,641
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#121
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,436
of 176,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them