↓ Skip to main content

Reverse Cardiac Remodeling: A Marker of Better Prognosis in Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reverse Cardiac Remodeling: A Marker of Better Prognosis in Heart Failure
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, March 2015
DOI 10.5935/abc.20150025
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In heart failure syndrome, myocardial dysfunction causes an increase in neurohormonal activity, which is an adaptive and compensatory mechanism in response to the reduction in cardiac output. Neurohormonal activity is initially stimulated in an attempt to maintain compensation; however, when it remains increased, it contributes to the intensification of clinical manifestations and myocardial damage. Cardiac remodeling comprises changes in ventricular volume as well as the thickness and shape of the myocardial wall. With optimized treatment, such remodeling can be reversed, causing gradual improvement in cardiac function and consequently improved prognosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 23 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2026.
All research outputs
#2,923,616
of 34,332,845 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#76
of 1,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,778
of 306,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,332,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,825 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.