↓ Skip to main content

Disentangling the impact of environmental and phylogenetic constraints on prokaryotic within-species diversity

Overview of attention for article published in The ISME Journal, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
78 X users

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Disentangling the impact of environmental and phylogenetic constraints on prokaryotic within-species diversity
Published in
The ISME Journal, February 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41396-020-0600-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oleksandr M. Maistrenko, Daniel R. Mende, Mechthild Luetge, Falk Hildebrand, Thomas S. B. Schmidt, Simone S. Li, João F. Matias Rodrigues, Christian von Mering, Luis Pedro Coelho, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Shinichi Sunagawa, Peer Bork

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 23%
Researcher 38 18%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 10 5%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 20%
Environmental Science 19 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 16 8%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 61 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#870,030
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#305
of 3,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,975
of 478,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#9
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.