You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disentangling the impact of environmental and phylogenetic constraints on prokaryotic within-species diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The ISME Journal, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41396-020-0600-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oleksandr M. Maistrenko, Daniel R. Mende, Mechthild Luetge, Falk Hildebrand, Thomas S. B. Schmidt, Simone S. Li, João F. Matias Rodrigues, Christian von Mering, Luis Pedro Coelho, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Shinichi Sunagawa, Peer Bork |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 13% |
| Germany | 8 | 10% |
| United States | 7 | 9% |
| India | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Singapore | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 54 | 68% |
| Members of the public | 24 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 193 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 22% |
| Researcher | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2022.
All research outputs
#816,369
of 24,488,567 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#302
of 3,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,367
of 465,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#9
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,488,567 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.