You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Transcranial Low-Level Light Therapy vs Sham Therapy Among Patients With Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Gabriela Figueiro Longo, Can Ozan Tan, Suk-tak Chan, Jonathan Welt, Arman Avesta, Eva Ratai, Nathaniel David Mercaldo, Anastasia Yendiki, Jacqueline Namati, Isabel Chico-Calero, Blair A. Parry, Lynn Drake, Rox Anderson, Terry Rauch, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Michael Lev, Jarone Lee, Michael Hamblin, Benjamin Vakoc, Rajiv Gupta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 52% |
| Japan | 2 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 22% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#397,472
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#2,435
of 9,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,003
of 428,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#87
of 438 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 438 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.