↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Transcranial Low-Level Light Therapy vs Sham Therapy Among Patients With Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
24 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Transcranial Low-Level Light Therapy vs Sham Therapy Among Patients With Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
JAMA Network Open, September 2020
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Gabriela Figueiro Longo, Can Ozan Tan, Suk-tak Chan, Jonathan Welt, Arman Avesta, Eva Ratai, Nathaniel David Mercaldo, Anastasia Yendiki, Jacqueline Namati, Isabel Chico-Calero, Blair A. Parry, Lynn Drake, Rox Anderson, Terry Rauch, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, Michael Lev, Jarone Lee, Michael Hamblin, Benjamin Vakoc, Rajiv Gupta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Unspecified 7 8%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 33 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Neuroscience 8 9%
Psychology 8 9%
Unspecified 7 8%
Engineering 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 35 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2022.
All research outputs
#288,801
of 21,761,312 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#1,407
of 6,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,982
of 321,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#52
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,761,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.