You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Individual-Based Modeling of Amazon Forests Suggests That Climate Controls Productivity While Traits Control Demography
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Earth Science, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/feart.2019.00083 |
| Authors |
Sophie Fauset, Manuel Gloor, Nikolaos M. Fyllas, Oliver L. Phillips, Gregory P. Asner, Timothy R. Baker, Lisa Patrick Bentley, Roel J. W. Brienen, Bradley O. Christoffersen, Jhon del Aguila-Pasquel, Christopher E. Doughty, Ted R. Feldpausch, David R. Galbraith, Rosa C. Goodman, Cécile A. J. Girardin, Euridice N. Honorio Coronado, Abel Monteagudo, Norma Salinas, Alexander Shenkin, Javier E. Silva-Espejo, Geertje van der Heijden, Rodolfo Vasquez, Esteban Alvarez-Davila, Luzmila Arroyo, Jorcely G. Barroso, Foster Brown, Wendeson Castro, Fernando Cornejo Valverde, Nallarett Davila Cardozo, Anthony Di Fiore, Terry Erwin, Isau Huamantupa-Chuquimaco, Percy Núñez Vargas, David Neill, Nadir Pallqui Camacho, Alexander Parada Gutierrez, Julie Peacock, Nigel Pitman, Adriana Prieto, Zorayda Restrepo, Agustín Rudas, Carlos A. Quesada, Marcos Silveira, Juliana Stropp, John Terborgh, Simone A. Vieira, Yadvinder Malhi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 31% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 167 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 41 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 56 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,033,284
of 24,171,551 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Earth Science
#570
of 5,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,710
of 353,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Earth Science
#34
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,551 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,543 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.