↓ Skip to main content

Design of a Genomics Curriculum: Competencies for Practicing Pathologists

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Design of a Genomics Curriculum: Competencies for Practicing Pathologists
Published in
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.5858/arpa.2014-0253-cp
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer Laudadio, Jeffrey L McNeal, Scott D Boyd, Long Phi Le, Christina Lockwood, Cindy B McCloskey, Gaurav Sharma, Karl V Voelkerding, Richard L Haspel

Abstract

Context .- The field of genomics is rapidly impacting medical care across specialties. To help guide test utilization and interpretation, pathologists must be knowledgeable about genomic techniques and their clinical utility. The technology allowing timely generation of genomic data is relatively new to patient care and the clinical laboratory, and therefore, many currently practicing pathologists have been trained without any molecular or genomics exposure. Furthermore, the exposure that current and recent trainees receive in this field remains inconsistent. Objective .- To assess pathologists' learning needs in genomics and to develop a curriculum to address these educational needs. Design .- A working group formed by the College of American Pathologists developed an initial list of genomics competencies (knowledge and skills statements) that a practicing pathologist needs to be successful. Experts in genomics were then surveyed to rate the importance of each competency. These data were used to create a final list of prioritized competencies. A subset of the working group defined subtopics and tasks for each competency. Appropriate delivery methods for the educational material were also proposed. Results .- A final list of 32 genomics competency statements was developed. A prioritized curriculum was created with designated subtopics and tasks associated with each competency. Conclusions .- We present a genomics curriculum designed as a first step toward providing practicing pathologists with the competencies needed to practice successfully.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,240,193
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#737
of 2,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,511
of 277,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
#15
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.