Title |
Design of a Genomics Curriculum: Competencies for Practicing Pathologists
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.5858/arpa.2014-0253-cp |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer Laudadio, Jeffrey L McNeal, Scott D Boyd, Long Phi Le, Christina Lockwood, Cindy B McCloskey, Gaurav Sharma, Karl V Voelkerding, Richard L Haspel |
Abstract |
Context .- The field of genomics is rapidly impacting medical care across specialties. To help guide test utilization and interpretation, pathologists must be knowledgeable about genomic techniques and their clinical utility. The technology allowing timely generation of genomic data is relatively new to patient care and the clinical laboratory, and therefore, many currently practicing pathologists have been trained without any molecular or genomics exposure. Furthermore, the exposure that current and recent trainees receive in this field remains inconsistent. Objective .- To assess pathologists' learning needs in genomics and to develop a curriculum to address these educational needs. Design .- A working group formed by the College of American Pathologists developed an initial list of genomics competencies (knowledge and skills statements) that a practicing pathologist needs to be successful. Experts in genomics were then surveyed to rate the importance of each competency. These data were used to create a final list of prioritized competencies. A subset of the working group defined subtopics and tasks for each competency. Appropriate delivery methods for the educational material were also proposed. Results .- A final list of 32 genomics competency statements was developed. A prioritized curriculum was created with designated subtopics and tasks associated with each competency. Conclusions .- We present a genomics curriculum designed as a first step toward providing practicing pathologists with the competencies needed to practice successfully. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 44% |
Australia | 2 | 13% |
Russia | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 6 | 38% |
Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
Researcher | 5 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 21% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 18% |