You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gender Differences in How Leaders Determine Succession Potential: The Role of Interpersonal Fit With Followers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00752 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Floor Rink, Janka I. Stoker, Michelle K. Ryan, Niklas K. Steffens, Anne Nederveen Pieterse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 23% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 24% |
| Psychology | 7 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,838,079
of 25,117,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,747
of 33,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,849
of 356,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#115
of 636 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,117,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 636 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.