↓ Skip to main content

Gender Differences in How Leaders Determine Succession Potential: The Role of Interpersonal Fit With Followers

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender Differences in How Leaders Determine Succession Potential: The Role of Interpersonal Fit With Followers
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00752
Authors

Floor Rink, Janka I. Stoker, Michelle K. Ryan, Niklas K. Steffens, Anne Nederveen Pieterse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Professor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 16 26%
Psychology 7 11%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 15 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,372,153
of 17,977,824 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,909
of 18,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,231
of 279,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#91
of 316 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,977,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,916 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 316 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.