The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gender Differences in How Leaders Determine Succession Potential: The Role of Interpersonal Fit With Followers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00752 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Floor Rink, Janka I. Stoker, Michelle K. Ryan, Niklas K. Steffens, Anne Nederveen Pieterse |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 24% |
| Psychology | 7 | 10% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#926,648
of 26,385,174 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,977
of 35,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,999
of 366,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#54
of 642 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 642 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.