↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in International Political Science Review, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 659)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
384 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
442 Mendeley
Title
The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women’s and Men’s Voting Behavior in Global Perspective
Published in
International Political Science Review, June 2016
DOI 10.1177/0192512100214007
Authors

Ronald Inglehart, Pippa Norris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 531 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 423 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 86 19%
Student > Master 68 15%
Student > Bachelor 63 14%
Researcher 41 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 69 16%
Unknown 94 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 247 56%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 23 5%
Psychology 19 4%
Arts and Humanities 18 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 2%
Other 24 5%
Unknown 103 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 482. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#56,325
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from International Political Science Review
#1
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,166
of 370,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Political Science Review
#1
of 192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.